Harish K Saini
January 13, 2026
It is the third Thursday of the month. In the world of mega-projects—whether you are building a giga-project in KSA, a metro line in Delhi, or a renewable energy grid in Europe—this day strikes a specific kind of nerve.
It is Steering Committee (SteerCo) Day.
You are standing in a boardroom (or staring into a high-definition Zoom camera) facing the Ministry or the Asset Owners or the Investors. These are people who control your budget, your timeline, and ultimately, your career trajectory.
For the last 29 days, you and your team have moved mountains. You have navigated supply chain disruptions, managed complex contractor disputes, and kept the critical path green. You know the project is healthy. You know you are in control.
But on the screen behind you, there is a problem.
It is your Monthly Status Report. It is a 60-slide deck packed with dense text, screenshots of P6 Gantt charts, blurry site photos, and complex Excel tables with font size 10.
The Minister looks at the screen, squints, and points to a single red cell in row 45 of a sub-contractor procurement table.
“Why is this red?” he asks.
.and for the next 50 minutes, the conversation derails.
Instead of discussing your strategic request for a budget variation to accelerate the timeline, you are stuck in the weeds, defending a minor delay that was actually resolved three days ago.
The meeting ends. Everyone is exhausted. The strategic decision you needed is deferred to “next month” pending “more information.”
You walk out knowing the truth: The project didn’t fail. The presentation did.
The "Reporting" Trap: Why Smart Directors Look Bad
The fundamental mistake most Program Directors make is confusing Reporting with Persuading.
In the engineering and construction world, we are trained to be comprehensive. We believe that transparency means showing everything. If we have 10,000 lines of data, we feel obligated to summarize at least 1,000 of them for the Board.
This approach triggers the “Auditor Mindset.”
When you present a “Data Dump” to a Steering Committee, you are subconsciously inviting them to find errors. A wall of numbers forces the executive brain to scan for anomalies. They stop being Visionaries and start being Auditors. They look for the red. They look for the gap. They look for the mistake.
This is a disaster for decision-making.
A SteerCo meeting is not an audit; it is a Governance Forum. Its purpose is not to prove you worked hard; its purpose is to remove roadblocks.
To survive the SteerCo, you must stop reporting activity and start visualizing progress.
The Cognitive Load Crisis: Why They Say "No"
To understand why your budget got deferred, you have to understand the psychology of the people in the room.
Your SteerCo members likely sit on four or five other boards. By the time they get to your meeting, they are suffering from severe Decision Fatigue.
The best example to understand Decision Fatigue is by understanding this study. A famous study by the National Academy of Sciences analyzed over a thousand judicial rulings by Israeli parole boards. The finding: a prisoner’s chance of getting parole was 65% right after a food break (breakfast or lunch). By the time the judges were tired and hungry, that chance dropped to nearly 0%.
The Lesson: When the executive brain is tired and confused, it stops judging based on facts and starts defaulting to the safest option:
The Status Quo. For a judge, the safe option is to keep the prisoner in jail. For a CEO, the safe, low-effort option is to say “No” (or the polite corporate equivalent: “Let’s circle back on this next time”), deferring your budget or timeline extension.
If your presentation requires them to:
- Read a paragraph to understand the context.
- Decode a complex chart to find the insight.
- Mental math to calculate the variance.
…you have already lost them. You are not competing against their intelligence; you are fighting for their Cognitive Energy.
The Solution: The "Cinematic" Status Update
At A1 Slides, we work with Program Directors managing portfolios ranging from $500M to $10B. We have found that the only way to consistently win in the SteerCo is to treat the Monthly Review not as a “Report,” but as a “Season Episode.”
We call this the Steering Committee Pack, and it relies on narrative architecture, not just graphic design.
Here is the 4-step framework we use to turn dry status updates into decision-driving narratives.
1. The "Previously On..." Recap (Context)
TV shows do this for a reason. They know you forgot what happened last week.
Never assume the Board remembers why they approved that variation last month.
The Fix: Start with a “Bridge Slide.”
- Left Side: What we promised last month.
- Right Side: What we delivered this month.
- Visual: Big green ticks or clear explanatory succinct text.
- Psychology This establishes a “Trust Rhythm.” You are subliminally training them to believe that when you promise X, you deliver Y.
2. Visual Evidence vs. Text Claims
In a construction or infrastructure project, Progress is Visible. Yet, most reports rely on text to describe it.
- Bad Slide: Bullet point saying “Foundation pouring is 40% complete.”
- Good Slide: A high-resolution drone render of the site, with a 3D overlay highlighting the 40% complete section in green and the remaining 60% in ghosted grey.
When you show the physical reality of the site, you ground the discussion in the real world. It makes the progress undeniable. It makes the Director look like a Master Builder, not just a Project Manager.
3. The "10/30 Rule" (Architecture)
We enforce a strict separation of church and state within the deck.
- The Executive 10: The first 10 slides contain only High-Level Insights, Visual Progress, and Key Decisions. No complex tables. No dense text. This is for the discussion.
- The Appendix 30: The remaining 30 slides contain the rigorous data, the detailed Gantt charts, and the risk logs. This is for the record.
If a Board member asks for the detail, you click a hyperlink to the Appendix, show the data, and then immediately return to the Executive 10. You never let the meeting get stuck in the Appendix.
4. The "Clean Ask" (Decision Design)
The most expensive slide in your deck is the “Decision Request” slide. This is where you ask for money, time, or resources.
Most people bury this request at the bottom of a slide filled with justification text.
The Fix: The “Single Decision” Slide.
- One Headline: “Decision Required: Approval of Vendor B.”
- Three Columns: Option A (Do Nothing), Option B (Select Vendor), Option C (Defer).
- A clear “Recommended Path” highlighted visually.
This forces the Board to choose. They cannot ignore it. They cannot get distracted by a typo in the footer. The entire screen is screaming for a decision.
Conclusion: Your Project is Too Important to Die by PowerPoint
You are building the future—whether it’s a smart city, a hospital, or a highway. The engineering is world-class. The construction is world-class. Why is the reporting amateur?
Don’t let your hard work get lost in a spreadsheet. Stop reporting the news. Start visualizing the victory.
Ready to Upgrade Your Monthly Review?
Service Spotlight: The “Steering Committee” Pack
A subscription service for Program Directors who need Board-Ready presentations, every single month.
- What you give us: Raw Excel data, Site Photos, Bullet points.
- What you get: A Cinematic, 15-slide Executive Narrative + Hyperlinked Data Appendix.
- Turnaround: 72 Hours.
Related post
Harish K Saini
January 13, 2026
Harish K Saini
January 9, 2026